Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1036220220250040282
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
2022 Volume.25 No. 4 p.282 ~ p.287
Biomechanical investigation of arm position on deforming muscular forces in proximal humerus fractures
Chalmers Christen E.

Wright David J.
Patel Nilay A.
Hitchens Hunter
McGarry Michelle H.
Lee Thay Q.
Scolaro John A.
Abstract
Background: Muscular forces drive proximal humeral fracture deformity, yet it is unknown if arm position can help mitigate such forces. Our hypothesis was that glenohumeral abduction and humeral internal rotation decrease the pull of the supraspinatus and subscapularis muscles, minimizing varus fracture deformity.

Methods: A medial wedge osteotomy was performed in eight cadaveric shoulders to simulate a two-part fracture. The specimens were tested on a custom shoulder testing system. Humeral head varus was measured following physiologic muscle loading at neutral and 20¡Æ humeral internal rotation at both 0¡Æ and 20¡Æ glenohumeral abduction.

Results: There was a significant decrease in varus deformity caused by the subscapularis (p<0.05) at 20¡Æ abduction. Significantly increasing humeral internal rotation decreased varus deformity caused by the subscapularis (p<0.05) at both abduction angles and that caused by the supraspinatus (p<0.05) and infraspinatus (p<0.05) at 0¡Æ abduction only.

Conclusions: Postoperative shoulder abduction and internal rotation can be protective against varus failure following proximal humeral fracture fixation as these positions decrease tension on the supraspinatus and subscapularis muscles. Use of a resting sling that places the shoulder in this position should be considered.
KEYWORD
Proximal humeral fracture, Biomechanics, Rotator cuff, Shoulder joint
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed